🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their loved ones.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.